Julia wrote:
That is true about other people but usually you are in the middle of trying to get to the bottom of who is who, this time you seem content to sit back and not say anything, this is most unlike you so thats my reasoning.
'I have other things on my mind' not being a good enough reason for my quietness, apparently, I will try to contribute more. However, I have already said what I think about Pete and Sparky, and I am still happy with my vote.
I don't have a lot to say about Jack - we have seen perfectly innocent, quiet behaviour from him before. Matching this up with Sparky's declaration that he's a villager, it would appear on the surface we have little to worry about.
However, while I do believe Pete to be the lying 'seer', I still have no real evidence that Sparky is the 'true' seer. This could mean Sparky is also lying, or is the fool, meaning his declaration of Jack's innocence counts for nothing.
But then, all of this has been said by other people, hence why I haven't previously bothered saying it myself. I just have nothing useful to add right now.
I am not going to sit here defending my quietness anymore - if Julia wants to keep poking at me about it, I'll have to start questioning exactly why she's doing that. Trying to get to the bottom of things? Or just trying to find reasons to put suspicion on others, to draw attention from herself?